Dating pimps and hookers Adult phone chat fresno
Cooper did not elicit information from the women about what happened to them or their victimization, nor about their willingness to become a prostitute or desire to leave. Cooper’s opinion about the specific women in the case: Two weeks before trial the Government disclosed an incomplete report form Dr.Cooper regarding her conversations with the women in the case and providing her diagnosis of 5 of 10 of the women. Cooper testified that her methodologies in developing her expertise were based on her medical practice, including personal interviews, reviewing the work of other researchers, clinical case analyses and investigative intelligence from law enforcement professionals, which include under-cover officers. Cooper’s testimony was relevant but only with respect to evidence about how pimps use fraud, force or coercion over their victims.Undue Prejudice Anderson contended that even if Dr.Lee's testimony were relevant, it should have been excluded because "its probative value [was] substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice." Appellant claimed that Dr.
Cooper diagnosed the women based on telephone conversations that lasted 1 hour, which even Dr.
(ii) Fit - the testimony was relevant and would assist the trier of fact Dr.